lohud.com

Sponsored by:

Completely Legal

Go behind the bench to examine the courts and cases in the Lower Hudson Valley.

State Panel: Bartlett Can Stay on Case

July
6

A state Appellate Division panel has ruled that acting state Supreme Court Justice Catherine Bartlett can oversee the sexual abuse trial involving Monsey businessman Zalman Silber and fired Ramapo police officer Andrew Dale.
The Appellate Division rejected District Attorney’s Office’s contention  Bartlett had actually recused herself.
Now, all that’s left is for Bartlett to schedule a trial date for either Dale or Silber. She separated their cases.
The sideshow to the trial has been contentious – adding to the rough relations between Bartlett and the District Attorney’s Office under Thomas Zugibe and his predecessor, Michael Bongiorno. Bartlett is a GOP-appointed Court of Claims judge assigned several years ago to Rockland County.
Dale and Silber are accused of performing gynecological exams on Silber’s now-former wife, who testimony the defense contends has been inconsistent and erratic. They each face four felony counts of unauthorized practice of a profession and fourth-degree aggravated sexual abuse.
Dale was fired by the Town Board following a disciplinary hearing after which the hearing officer recommended a year’s suspension without pay. His firing came a day after his indictment. Dale has filed a federal lawsuit seeking millions of dollars from the town over his firing.
The recusal issues came about in February when Bartlett informed defense and prosecution lawyers that someone had spoken to her about Silber’s divorce.
Prosecutors argued she recused herself and couldn’t take it back. Defense lawyers contended she offered the option, but never decided to recuse herself.
After several weeks of considering recusal, Bartlett released a 22-page decision presenting her legal arguments to stay on the case, contending she could hear the jury case without bias. The Rockland District Attorney’s Office appealed.
The appellate judges wrote in a June 30 decision that that recusal is a decision “solely within the discretion and personal conscience” of the judge.
Defense attorney David Goldstein, who represents Dale, said today that the panel echoed the contentions of the defendants. Both Silber and Dale felt Bartlett could be fair and wanted Bartlett to remain.
In the Dale-Silber case, Bartlett previously dismissed 24 misdemeanor sexual abuse charges and two counts of official misconduct against Dale. Silber faces separate type of sexual abuse charges on the same issue brought by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.
First Assistant District Attorney James Mellion declined comment on the decision.

This entry was posted on Monday, July 6th, 2009 at 12:28 pm by Steve Lieberman.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Print This Post Print This Post | Email This Post Email This Post

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Advertisement
About this blog
Journal News reporters blog about the doings in state and federal courts in the LoHud region and beyond.

Subscribe

Daily Blog Email Updates


The Authors



Advertisement
Other recent entries

Links

Recent Comments


Advertisement


Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives


Bad Behavior has blocked 506 access attempts in the last 7 days.